Skip to main content

The Laws of War

Thus, for example, prior to laying siege to a city, it must be determined that it can be captured without destroying it.  There is no warrant for  destroying a town "in order to save it."
 -sifra devarim section 203, Finkelstein p.239
The other rules of sieges follow similar lines of thought.  Indefensible villages may not be subject to siege.  Negotiations with the enemy must precede subjecting a city to hunger, thirst, or disease for the purpose of exacting a settlement.  Messengers of peace must be sent to a hostile city for three days.  If the terms are accepted, no harm may befall any of the inhabitants of the city.  If the terms are not accepted, the siege is not to begin until the enemy has opened hostilities.  Even after the siege is laid, a side must be left open as an escape route. see Leo Jung, "Jewish Attitude Toward Peace and War."
Philo warns that national vendettas are not justifications for wars.  If a city under siege sues for peace it is to be granted.  Peace, albeit, with sacrifices, says Philo, is preferable to the horrors of war.  But peace means peace.  He writes:  "If the adversaries persist in their rashness to the point of madness, they (the besiegers) must proceed to the attack invigorated by enthusiasm and having, in the justice of their cause, an invincible ally."  "The Special Laws," 10, 221

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contact

“Between 1305 and the early 1800’s. the House of Taxis ran a form of pony express service all over Europe….   Its couriers clad in blue and silver uniforms, crisscrossed the continent carrying messages between princes and generals, merchants and money lenders.” –Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave We may think we are the first generation consumed by rapid communication but we are not.   Throughout our history it has been a priority. Of course, now in the 21 st century we must ask: are we better or worse for it?