Skip to main content

Mind You

David C. Kogan played an active role in the governance of the Rabbinical School at JTS, often mediating between the needs and wants of students and faculty.  Professor Saul Lieberman, although Rector, generally did not attend faculty meetings. One time when Kogan felt that the agenda of a particular faculty meeting dictated that Lieberman's presence would be essential, he went out of his way to invite Lieberman especially to this faculty meeting (and hoped that there wouldn't be too much time-wasting at this particular meeting).

Lieberman did cooperate by attending the meeting.  However, much to Kogan’s chagrin, there was more time-wasting than usual.  D.C.Kogan was in a difficult position, as he was indubitably the one responsible for luring Lieberman to this colossal waste of time.


As the meeting adjourned, D.C.K. felt that it made sense to be proactive with Lieberman, unpleasant as that might be.   So, instead of trying to slither away, he approached Lieberman directly at the end of the meeting.  To his great surprise, Lieberman said: "Rabbi Kogen, this was a very good meeting."  D.C.K. must have had a confused look on his face, perhaps indicating "Were you at the same meeting that I just sat through?"  Lieberman then explained: "I was able to review six Masekhtot."  (Anyone who studied with Lieberman understood that long before analyzing any text -- short or long -- Lieberman committed the immense text to memory.) -Judah Kogan

What happens in the mid is always superior to what happens outside.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contact

“Between 1305 and the early 1800’s. the House of Taxis ran a form of pony express service all over Europe….   Its couriers clad in blue and silver uniforms, crisscrossed the continent carrying messages between princes and generals, merchants and money lenders.” –Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave We may think we are the first generation consumed by rapid communication but we are not.   Throughout our history it has been a priority. Of course, now in the 21 st century we must ask: are we better or worse for it?